<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>pki on Raúl Pastor</title><link>https://pixelotes.com/tags/pki/</link><description>Recent content in pki on Raúl Pastor</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 21:10:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pixelotes.com/tags/pki/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>eMudhra's guessable CA keys: what happened and how to check your estate</title><link>https://pixelotes.com/blog/emudhra-weak-ca-keys/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:40:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://pixelotes.com/blog/emudhra-weak-ca-keys/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-happened"&gt;What happened&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A certificate authority (CA) is trusted to vouch for websites and software publishers. That trust rests on one thing: nobody else can use the CA&amp;rsquo;s private key.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;On 17 October 2026 an independent researcher reported that eight &lt;strong&gt;intermediate CA certificates&lt;/strong&gt; from eMudhra, an Indian CA, had private keys with values &lt;strong&gt;below 256&lt;/strong&gt;. A healthy P-384 key is a random number around 115 digits long. These could be found by trying at most 256 values, and one of them was literally the number 4.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>